基于不排水强度的黏土基坑抗隆起稳定计算方法

doi:10.11779/CJGE202009001

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (712 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目前的基坑抗隆起稳定计算方法多是直接采用固结不排水强度指标进行计算,这种方法对于软黏土地层的计算在理论上是不合理的,且传统的圆弧滑动法未考虑最下道支撑以上土体强度的发挥。针对上述问题,通过将固结不排水强度指标转换成不排水抗剪强度,考虑最下道支撑以上土体强度的发挥,对传统圆弧滑动法进行了改进,并进一步提出了基于不排水强度的圆弧机构上限分析方法。工程算例分析表明,传统圆弧滑动法得到的安全系数普遍偏高,而所提出上限分析方法计算得到的结果则更为合理。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	黄茂松
	李弈杉
	唐震
	袁聚云

关键词 ：基坑, 圆弧滑动法, 抗隆起稳定, 不排水强度, 极限分析法

Abstract：At present, the analysis method for basal stability is mostly based on the consolidated undrained shear strength index. The method is unreasonable in theory for the soft clay and does not consider the strength of the soil above the lowest support. To solve the above problems, the traditional analysis method for basal stability is improved. The consolidated undrained shear strength index is converted into undrained shear strength, and the strength of the soil above the lowest support is considered. Furthermore, the circular arc mechanism of the upper bound limit analysis based on the undrained shear strength is proposed. Through the calculations of engineering cases, the factors of safety obtained by the traditional circular sliding method is generally high, while the results obtained by the proposed upper-bound solution are more reasonable.

Key words： braced excavation circular sliding method basal stability undrained shear strength limit analysis method

收稿日期: 2019-12-26

ZTFLH:

TU473

基金资助:国家自然科学基金重点项目（51738010）; 国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0800202）

作者简介: 黄茂松(1965— ),男,浙江玉环人,博士,教授,博士生导师,从事岩土工程方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: mshuang@.tongji.edu.cn。

引用本文:

黄茂松, 李弈杉, 唐震, 袁聚云. 基于不排水强度的黏土基坑抗隆起稳定计算方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2020, 42(9): 1577-1585. HUANG Mao-song, LI Yi-shan, TANG Zhen, YUAN Ju-yun. Analysis method for basal stability of braced excavations in clay based on undrained shear strength. Chinese J. Geot. Eng., 2020, 42(9): 1577-1585.

链接本文:

http://manu31.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_ytgcxb/CN/10.11779/CJGE202009001 或 http://manu31.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_ytgcxb/CN/Y2020/V42/I9/1577

[1] 郑刚, 程雪松. 考虑弧长和法向应力修正的基坑抗隆起稳定计算方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(5): 781-789.
(ZHENG Gang, CHENG Xue-song.Basal stability analysis method considering arc length and normal stress correction[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(5): 781-789. (in Chinese))
[2] 黄茂松, 宋晓宇, 秦会来. K₀固结黏土基坑抗隆起稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(2): 250-255.
(HUANG Mao-song, SONG Xiao-yu, QIN Hui-lai.Basal stability of braced excavations in K₀-consolidated soft clay by upper bound method[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(2): 250-255. (in Chinese))
[3] 黄茂松, 余生兵, 秦会来. 基于上限法的K₀固结黏土基坑抗隆起稳定分析[J]. 土木工程学报, 2011, 44(3): 101-108.
(HUANG Mao-song, YU Sheng-bing, QIN Hui-lai.Upper bound method for basal stability analysis of braced excavations in K₀-consolidated clays[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal, 2011, 44(3): 101-108. (in Chinese))
[4] CHEN W F.Limit Analysis and Soil Plasticity[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Scientific, 1975.
[5] CHANG M F.Basal stability analysis of braced cuts in clay[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, 2000, 126(3): 276-279.
[6] HUANG M S, TANG Z, YUAN J Y.Basal stability analysis of braced excavations with embedded walls in undrained clay using the upper bound theorem[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 79: 231-241.
[7] TERZAGHI K, PECK R B.Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice[M]. New York: Wiley, 1948.
[8] BJERRUM L, EIDE O.Stability of strutted excavations in clay[J]. Géotechnique, 1956, 6: 32-47.
[9] 建筑基坑支护技术规程:JGJ 120—2012[S]. 2012.
(Technical Specification for Retaining and Protection of Building Foundation Excavations:JGJ 120—2012[S]. 2002. (in Chinese))
[10] 建筑基坑工程技术规范:YB 9258—97[S]. 1998.
(Code for Technique of Building Foundation Pit Engineering:YB 9258—97[S]. 1998. (in Chinese))
[11] 基坑工程技术标准(上海):DG/TJ08—61—2018[S]. 2018.
(Technical Code for Excavation Engineering: DG/TJ08—61—2018[S]. 2018. (in Chinese))
[12] HSIEN P G, OU C Y, LIU H T.Basal heave analysis of excavations with consideration of anisotropic undrained strength of clay[J]. Can Geotech J, 2008, 45: 788-799.
[13] 王洪新. 基坑的尺寸效应及考虑开挖宽度的抗隆起稳定安全系数计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2016, 37(增刊2): 433-441.
(WANG Hong-xin.Size effect of foundation pits and calculation method of safety factor of heave-resistant stability considering excavation width[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(S2): 433-441. (in Chinese))
[14] 应宏伟, 王小刚, 张金红. 考虑基坑宽度影响的基坑抗隆起稳定分析[J]. 工程力学, 2018, 35(5): 118-124.
(YING Hong-wei, WANG Xiao-gang, ZHANG Jin-hong.Limit equilibrium analysis on stability against basal heave of excavation in anisotropy soft clay[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2018, 35(5): 118-124. (in Chinese))
[15] 周建, 蔡露, 罗凌晖, 等. 各向异性软土基坑抗隆起稳定极限平衡分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 1-10.
(ZHOU Jian, CAI Lu, LUO Ling-hui, et al.Limit equilibrium analysis on stability against basal heave of excavation in anisotropic soft clay[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2019, 40(12): 1-10. (in Chinese))
[16] CHEN R P, LI Z C, CHEN Y M, et al.Failure investigation at a collapsed deep excavation in very sensitive organic soft clay[J]. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 2015, 29(3): 04014078.
[17] TUAN D, OU C Y, CHEN R P.A study of failure mechanisms of deep excavations in soft clay using the finite element method[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2016, 73: 153-163.
[18] 沈珠江. 基于有效固结应力理论的黏土土压力公式[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2000, 22(3): 353-356.
(SHEN Zhu-jiang.Soil pressure formula of clay based on effective consolidation stress theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2000, 22(3): 353-356. (in Chinese))
[19] O'ROURKE T D.Base Stability and Ground Movement Prediction for Excavations in Soft Clay[M]// Retaining Structures. London: Thomas Telford, 1993: 131-139.
[20] 张旷成, 李继民. 杭州地铁湘湖站“08.11.15”基坑坍塌事故分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2010, 32(增刊1): 338-342.
(ZHANG Kuang-cheng, LI Ji-min.Accident analysis for“08.11.15”foundation pit collapse of Xianghu Station of Hangzhou metro[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2010, 32(S1): 338-342. (in Chinese))