路堤荷载下土工织物散体桩复合地基离心模型试验

doi:10.11779/CJGE201805019

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1710 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要进行了2组不同筋材刚度土工织物散体桩复合地基路堤离心模型试验,和1组碎石桩复合地基路堤的对比试验,以研究其在真实应力条件下的性状及稳定性。研究结果表明：随着筋材刚度的增大,地基中的超孔隙水压力略有减小,桩顶和桩间土沉降明显减小,而桩顶和桩间土之间的差异沉降明显增大;桩土应力比随筋材刚度的增大先增长明显,而后趋于缓慢;当筋材刚度较低或上覆荷载很大时,土工织物散体桩可发生显著的弯曲变形而引起较大的沉降,碎石桩则在软土中容易发生鼓胀变形而引起很大的沉降,但两者均未在复合地基中形成剪切滑移的趋势。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	陈建峰
	李良勇
	徐超
	冯守中

关键词 ：路堤, 土工织物散体桩, 离心模型试验, 沉降, 桩土应力比, 稳定性

Abstract：The centrifugal model tests are performed on embankments on composite foundation reinforced by two groups of geosynthetic-encased stone columns (GECs) with different stiffnesses and by a group of ordinary stone columns (OSCs) as a comparison test. The behavior and stability of GECs under actual stress conditions are studied. The results show that an increase in geosynthetic stiffness leads to a little decrease in the excess pore water pressure, apparent decrease in the settlements at the top of the columns and the soils, whereas apparent increase in the differential settlement. The stress concentration ratio increases with an increase in the geosynthetic stiffness, but the rate of increase decreases gradually. When the geosynthetic stiffness is low or embankment load is large, GECs can bend significantly so as to incur apparent settlement, while OSCs are apt to bulge to incur larger settlement. However, there is no tendency of shear sliding in the soils treated by GECs and OSCs.

Key words： embankment geosynthetic-encased stone column centrifugal model test settlement stress concentration ratio stability

作者简介: 陈建峰(1972- ),男,浙江余姚人,工学博士,教授,主要从事加筋土结构与边坡支护、岩体力学与工程等方面的教学与研究工作。E-mail: jf_chen@tongji.edu.cn。

引用本文:

陈建峰, 李良勇, 徐超, 冯守中. 路堤荷载下土工织物散体桩复合地基离心模型试验[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2018, 40(5): 932-938. CHEN Jian-feng, LI Liang-yong, XU Chao, FENG Shou-zhong. Centrifugal model tests on composite foundation reinforced by geosynthetic- encased stone columns under embankment loads. Chinese J. Geot. Eng., 2018, 40(5): 932-938.

链接本文:

http://manu31.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_ytgcxb/CN/10.11779/CJGE201805019 或 http://manu31.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_ytgcxb/CN/Y2018/V40/I5/932

[1] ALEXIEW D, BROKEMPER D, LOTHSPEICH S. Geotextile encased columns (GEC): load capacity, geotextile selection and pre-design graphs[C]// Proceedings of the Geo-frontiers Conference. Austin, 2005: 497-510.
[2] RAITHEL M, KIRCHNER A, SCHADE C, et al. Foundation of constructions on very soft soils with geotextile encased columns—state of the art[C]// Proceedings of Geo Frontiers. Reston, 2005: 1-11.
[3] 赵明华, 顾美湘, 张玲, 等. 竖向土工加筋体对碎石桩承载变形影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(9): 1587-1593. (ZHAO Ming-hua, GU Mei-xiang, ZHANG Ling, et al. Model tests on influence of vertical geosynthetic-encasement on performance of stone columns[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014, 36(9): 1587-1593. (in Chinese))
[4] 张仪萍, 王洋. 非瞬时加载下土工袋装砂石桩复合地基固结解析解[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(增刊1): 3096-3102. (ZHANG Yi-ping, WANG Yang. Analytical solution for composite ground with geosynthetic encased stone column under time-dependent loading[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(S1): 3096-3102. (in Chinese))
[5] 王纯子, 陈昌富, 赵阳. 顶部加箍碎石桩极限承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2015, 36(6): 1801-1806. (WANG Chun-zi, CHEN Chang-fu, ZHAO Yang. Upper-bound limit analysis of ultimate bearing capacity of upper geosynthetic-encased stone column[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(6): 1801-1806. (in Chinese))
[6] 陈建峰, 童振湄, 柳军修, 等. 竖向荷载下加筋碎石桩复合地基数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2013, 32(增刊2): 393-399. (CHEN Jian-feng, TONG Zhen-mei, LIU Jun-xiu, et al. Numerical analyses of composite foundation of geosynthetic-encasement stone columns subjected to vertical loading[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 32(S2): 393-399. (in Chinese))
[7] CHEN J F, LI L Y, XUE J F, et al. Failure mechanism of geosynthetic-encased stone columns in soft soils under embankment[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2015, 43(5): 424-431.
[8] 陈建峰, 王波, 魏静, 等. 加筋碎石桩复合地基路堤模型试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2015, 28(9): 1-8. (CHEN Jian-feng, WANG Bo, WEI Jing, et al. Model tests of embankments on soft foundation reinforced with geosynthetic-encased stone columns[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2015, 28(9): 1-8. (in Chinese))
[9] FATTAH M Y, ZABAR B S, HASSAN H A. Experimental analysis of embankment on ordinary and encased stone columns[J]. International Journal of Geomechanics, 2016: 04015102.
[10] ALMEIDA M S S, HOSSEINPOUR I, RICCIO M, et al. Behavior of geotextile-encased granular columns supporting test embankment on soft deposit[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2014, 141(3): 04014116.
[11] 陈建峰, 柳军修, 马君. 实验室用小型单桥静力触探探头的标定[J]. 同济大学学报 (自然科学版), 2012, 40(4): 549-552, 588. (CHEN Jian-feng, LIU Jun-xiu, MA Jun. Calibration of a mniature cone penetrometer for geotechnical model test[J]. Journal of Tongji University: Natural Science, 2012, 40(4): 549-552, 588. (in Chinese))
[12] PULKO B, MAJES B, LOGAR J. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: analytical calculation model[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2011, 29(1): 29-39.