Abstract：By analyzing the behaviours of sands, a constitutive model for sands is proposed based on the UH model. The model has the following characteristics: (1) the model can describe that the isotropic compression line of sands is a curve in the e-lnp plane by introducing a compressive hardening parameter. (2) The stress ratio at the characteristic state point of loose sand is relatively large, and that of dense sand is relatively small, which can be described by the new model by introducing a dilatancy parameter. (3) The yield surface of sands is proposed by introducing a critical state parameter, and the position of the critical state line (CSL) in the e-lnp plane can be accurately described by the proposed model. Compared with the UH model, the proposed model requires three additional sand parameters which can be determined by the conventional triaxial tests. Finally, the validity of the new model is confirmed by the data from triaxial drained and undrained compression tests for sands.
姚仰平, 刘林, 罗汀. 砂土的UH模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2016, 38(12): 2147-2153.
YAO Yang-ping, LIU Lin, LUO Ting. UH model for sands. Chinese J. Geot. Eng., 2016, 38(12): 2147-2153.
[1] LADE P V, DUNCAN J M. Elasto-plastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil[J]. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1975, 101(10): 1037-1053. [2] BEEN K, JEFFERIES M G, HACHEY J. The critical state of sands[J]. Géotechnique, 1992, 42 (4): 655-663. [3] LI X S, DAFALIAS Y F. Dilatancy for cohesionless soils[J]. Géotechnique, 2000, 50(4): 449-460. [4] POOROOSHASB H B, HOLUBEC I, SHERBOURNE A N. Yielding and flow of sand in triaxial compression, Part I[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1966, 3(5): 179-190. [5] POOROOSHASB H B, HOLUBEC I, SHERBOURNE A N. Yielding and flow of sand in triaxial compression, Part II[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1967, 4(4): 376-397. [6] YAO Y P, SUN D A, LUO T. A critical state model for sands dependent on stress and density[J]. International Journal for Numerical & Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2004, 28: 323-337. [7] YAO Y P, HOU W, ZHOU A N. Constitutive model for overconsolidated clays[J]. Science China Technological Sciences, 2008, 51(2): 179-191. [8] YAO Y P, HOU W, ZHOU A N. UH model: three dimensional unified hardening model for overconsolidated clays[J]. Géotechnique, 2009, 59(5): 451-469. [9] LADE P V, BOOP P A. Relative density effects on drained sand behavior at high pressures[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2005, 45: 1-13. [10] PESTANA J M, WHITTLE A J. Formulation of a unified constitutive model for clays and sands[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 1999, 23: 1215-1243. [11] SHENG D C, YAO Y P, CARTER J P. A volume-stress model for sands under isotropic and critical stress states[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2008, 45(11): 1639-1645. [12] ASAOKA A. An elasto-plastic description of two distinct volume change mechanisms of soils[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2002, 42(5): 47-57. [13] VERDUGO R, ISHIHARA K. The steady state of sandy soils[J]. Soil and Foundations, 1996, 36: 81-91. [14] 姚仰平, 余亚妮. 基于统一硬化参数的砂土临界状态本构 模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(12): 1827-1832. (YAO Yang-ping, YU Ya-ni. Extended critical state constitutive model for sand based on unified hardening parameter[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(12): 1827-1832. (in Chinese)) [15] ISHIHARA K. Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes[J]. Géotechnique, 1996, 43(3): 351-415.
