Abstract：Based on the wave function expansion method, the dynamic response analysis of a deep buried cylindrical composite-lining cavity with a new buffer layer mode, namely "rock- buffer layer-primary support-secondary lining" mode, in an elastic space subjected to incident plane SV waves is made. The factors affecting the dynamic stress concentration of the lining structure, elastic modulus and thickness of the buffer layer are discussed. By conducting the large-scale shaking table model tests on the tunnel across the fault zone, some engineering significant conclusions are drawn by analyzing the dynamic properties and fracture patterns of the tunnel across the fault and that with buffer layer. With the lower elastic modulus and smaller thickness of the buffer layer, the dynamic stress concentration of the secondary lining decreases, but the best ratio of the elastic modulus of the buffer layer to that of the surrounding rock is between 1/10~1/20, and the optimal thickness of the buffer layer is no larger than 0.2 m. With the buffer layer, the lining peak acceleration and the dynamic strain amplitudes of the lining decrease. Most of the complex and wider cracks of the lining concentrate on the spandrel and arch foot when the tunnel crosses the fault zone, however, the number of lining cracks decreases with shock sorption joint layers, which shows that the force status of the lining is significantly improved. Wider cracks occur on the ground surface along the fault, and many smaller cracks intersect the fault, which shows that the tunnels and surrounding rock are damaged by shearing force when it crosses the fault, and the number of the crack on the top surface is reduced with the buffer layer. The research conclusions may provide references for the shock and sorption design of tunnels across fault, and they are of important practical engineering significance.
王帅帅,高波,隋传毅,闻毓民. 减震层减震原理及跨断层隧道减震技术振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(6): 1086-1092.
WANG Shuai-shuai, GAO BO, SUI Chuan-yi, WEN Yu-min. Mechanism of shock absorption layer and shaking table tests on shaking absorption technology of tunnel across fault. Chinese J. Geot. Eng., 2015, 37(6): 1086-1092.
[1] PAO Y H, MAO C C. The diffraction of elastic waves and dynamic stress concentrations[M]. New York: Crane, Russak & Company Inc, 1972.
[2] DAVIS C A, LEE V W, BARDET J. Transverse response of underground cavities and pipes to incident SV waves[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics,2001, 30(3): 383–410.
[3] LEE V W, T RIFUNAC M D. Response of tunnels to incident SH waves[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 1979, 105: 643–659.
[4] LE E V W, KARL J. Diffraction of SV waves by underground, circular, cylindrical cavities[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 1992, 11: 445–456.
[5] 梁建文, 纪晓东. 地下衬砌洞室对Rayleigh 波的放大作用 [J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2006, 26(4): 24–31. (LIANG Jian-wen, JI Xiao-dong. Amplification of Rayleigh waves due to underground lined cavities[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2006, 26(4): 24–31. (in Chinese))
[6] 纪晓东, 梁建文, 杨建江. 地下圆形衬砌洞室在平面P 波 和SV 波入射下动应力集中问题的级数解[J]. 天津大学学 报, 2006, 39(5): 511–517. (JI Xiao-dong, LIANG Jian-wen, YANG Jian-jiang. On dynamic stress concentration of an underground cylindrical lined cavity subjected to incident plane P and SV waves[J]. Journal of Tianjin University, 2006, 39(5): 511–517. (in Chinese))
[7] 李 刚, 钟启凯, 尚守平. 平面SH波入射下深埋圆形组合 衬砌洞室的动力反应分析[J]. 湖南大学学报 (自然科学 版), 2010, 37(1): 17–22. (LI Gang, ZHONG Qi-kai, SHANG Shou-ping. Dynamic response analysis of deep buried cylindrical composite-lining cavity subjected to incident plane SH waves[J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2010, 37(1): 17–22. (in Chinese))
[8] 钟启凯. 地下圆形组合衬砌洞室在地震波下的动力反应分 析[D]. 长沙: 湖南大学, 2009. (ZHONG Qi-kai. Dynamic response analysis of underground cylindrical composite-lining cavern subjected to seismic waves[D]. Changsha: Hunan University, 2009. (in Chinese))
[9] 王峥峥, 高 波, 索然绪. 双洞隧道洞口段抗减震振动台 试验[J]. 中国公路学报, 2009, 22(2): 71–76. (WANG Zheng-zheng, GAO Bo, SUO Ran-xu. Shaking table tests on entrance anti-seism of double track tunnels[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2009, 22(2): 71–76. (in Chinese))
[10] 王峥峥. 跨断层隧道结构非线性地震损伤反应分析[D]. 成都: 西南交通大学, 2007. (WANG Zheng-zheng. Nonlinear seismic damage response of tunnel structure across fault[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University, 2007. (in Chinese))
[11] 信春雷, 高 波, 周佳媚, 等. 跨断层隧道抗减震措施性 能振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014(8): 1414– 1422. (XIN Chun-lei, GAO Bo, ZHOU Jia-mei, et al. Shaking table tests on performances of anti-seismic and damping measures for fault-crossing tunnel structures[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2014(8): 1414-1422. (in Chinese))
[12] 高 波, 王峥峥, 袁 松, 等. 汶川地震公路隧道震害启 示[J]. 西南交通大学学报, 2009, 44(3): 336–374. (GAO Bo, WANG Zheng-zheng, YUAN Song, et al. Lessons learnt from damage of highway tunnels in Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 2009, 44(3): 336– 374. (in Chinese))
