Abstract:The peak shear strength of rock joints is influenced by both the surface morphology and the mechanical parameters of joint materials. In the existing references, special attention has been paid to the importance of roughness. Here, the importance of tensile strength of joint materials is discussed. The three-dimensional surface morphology along shear direction is captured by using the maximum potential contact area ratio, the maximum apparent inclination angle and the distribution of inclination angle. A new peak shear strength criterion is proposed, in which the dilatancy angle expressed by a hyperbolic function is used. A total of 85 sets of data are used to validate the criterion. The results show that there is good agreement between the calculated and measured values. 28 sets of data from natural rock joints are used to compare the new criterion and the famous JRC-JCS criterion. The discrepancy between the measured and calculated values by JRC-JCS criterion is something larger. The proposed criterion can be used as a predictive tool to evaluate the peak shear strength of rock joints owing to the fact that the roughness parameters can be easily obtained in the laboratory and the subjectivity can be avoided.
[1] BARTON N. Review of a new shear-strength criterion for rock joints[J]. Engineering Geology, 1973, 7(4): 287-332. [2] BARTON N,CHOUBEY V. The shear strength of rock joint in theory and practice[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1977, 10(1): 1-54. [3] ISRM. Suggested methods for the quantitative description of discontinuities in rock masses[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1978, 15(6): 319-368. [4] BEER A J, STEAD D,COGGAN J S. Estimation of the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) by visual[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2002, 35(1): 65-74. [5] GRASSELLI G, WIRTH J, EGGER P. Quantitative 3D description of a rough surface and parameter evolution with shearing[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2002, 39(6): 789-800. [6] GRASSELLI G, EGGER P. Constitutive law for the shear strength of rock joints based on 3-D surface parameters[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2003, 40(1): 25-40. [7] YANG Z Y, TAGHICHIAN A,HUANG G D. On the applicability of self-affinity concept in scale of three-dimensional rock joints[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2011, 48(7): 1173-1187. [8] GRASSELLI G. Shear strength of rock joints based on quantified surface description[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2006, 39(4): 295-314. [9] XIA C C, TANG Z C, XIAO W M, et al. New peak shear strength criterion of rock joints based on quantified surface description[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2014, 47(2): 387-400. [10] MAKSIMOVIC M. New description of the shear strength for rock joints[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 1992, 25(4): 275-284. [11] TATONE B S A,GRASSELLI G. A method to evaluate the three-dimensional roughness of fracture surfaces in brittle geomaterials[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 2009, 80(12): 125110. [12] GHAZVINIAN A H, AZINFAR M J, GERANMAYEH- VANEGHI R. Importance of tensile strength on the shear behavior of discontinuities[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2012, 45: 349-359. [13] PARK J W,SONG J J. Numerical simulation of a direct shear test on a rock joint using a bonded-particle model[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2009, 46(8): 1315-1328. [14] BAHAADDINI M, SHARROCK G, HEBBLEWHITE B K. Numerical direct shear tests to model the shear behaviour of rock joints[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 2013, 51(1): 101-115. [15] SCHNEIDER H J. The friction and deformation behaviour of rock joints[J]. Rock Mechanics, 1976, 8: 169-185. [16] MAKSIMOVIC M. The shear strength components of a rough rock joint [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences and Geomechanics, Abstracts, 1996, 33(8): 769-783. [17] 唐志成. 考虑扰动影响的节理与柱状节理岩体的力学性质[D]. 上海: 同济大学, 2013. (TANG Zhi-cheng. Mechanical behaviors of rock joint under different contact state and columnar jointed rock mass[D]. Shanghai: Tongji University, 2013. (in Chinese)) [18] TATONE B S A. Quantitative characterization of natural rock discontinuity roughness in-situ and in the laboratory[D]. Toronto: University of Toronto, 2009. [19] ASADOLLAHI P,TONON F. Constitutive model for rock fractures: Revisiting Barton's empirical model[J]. Engineering Geology, 2010, 113(1): 11-32.