基于汶川地震震害经验的土石坝抗震设计规范修编

doi:10.11779/CJGE201511025

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (440 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要基于汶川等地震震害、地震响应、震害机理、安全评价等方面的研究成果,主要从4个方面论述了《水工建筑物抗震设计规范》修编中有关地基和土石坝抗震设计的进展。①抗震设防标准及基本原则：调整了抗震设计标准和设计地震的确定方法;对特别重要工程按最大可信地震校核不发生库水失控下泄灾变安全裕度;一定情况下设计地震反应谱的确定需要考虑地震近场效应、上盘效应及频谱不平稳性等;对抗震甲类工程抗震设计需制定防震减灾应急预案;规定了土石坝地震反应谱,取加速度最大反应谱值=1.60,对应的阻尼比为20%。②场地与地基：调整了工程建设场地分类方法,场地土类型由4类调整为5类,场地类别划分更为详细;对标贯击数判别液化方法中的液化临界标贯击数计算公式进行了调整,并修订了考虑上覆有效应力影响的标贯击数校正公式。③土石坝抗震计算与安全评价：扩充了抗震计算的内容要求,规定抗震计算包括抗震稳定计算、永久变形计算、防渗体安全评价和液化可能性判别等内容;扩大了要求采用动力法进行地震作用效应分析和安全性评价的范围,规定对设计烈度Ⅶ度且坝高150 m以上,设计烈度Ⅷ、Ⅸ度且坝高70 m以上,地基中存在可液化土层等3种情况,应同时进行基于有限元法的动力分析,对覆盖层厚度超过40 m的土石坝宜进行动力分析;补充了对土石坝地震作用效应进行动力分析的原则要求,包括本构模型选取、计算参数确定、残余变形计算、稳定分析要求等;补充规定了根据动力法成果对土石坝的抗震安全性进行综合评价的原则要求。④面板堆石坝抗震工程措施：主要根据紫坪铺大坝设计、建设及震害经验,增加了针对面板堆石坝的抗震工程措施,包括坝体地震变形控制、坝顶及其附近坝坡防护、面板及垂直缝抗挤压、水平施工缝抗错台及接缝细部构造设计等。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘小生
	赵剑明
	杨玉生
	王钟宁
	杨正权
	刘启旺
	陈宁

关键词 ：汶川地震, 震害经验, 规范修编, 土石坝, 抗震计算, 抗震措施

Abstract：The advances in seismic design of earth-rockfill dams and foundations and the revision of code for seismic design of hydraulic structures in China (SL203-97/DL5073-2000) are presented based on research results and lessons from Wenchuan Earthquake disasters. The main revisions and advances focus on four aspects: (1) Seismic fortification criterion and its basic principles, in which the seismic design criterion, design parameters of ground motions and method for determining seismic waves are revised. For especially important projects, the seismic safety margins of the structures under MCE shall be assessed in order to prevent any collapse resulting in reservoir water discharging catastrophically. The near-field effect, hanging wall effect and unsteadiness of the frequency spectrum shall be considered when determining the design earthquake response spectrum. Earthquake prevention and disaster mitigation emergency contingency plans are required for the structures with engineering seismic fortification category of Class A. The seismic response spectrum for earth-rockfill dams is stipulated, and the value of the maximum acceleration response spectrum ( ) is taken as 1.60, whose corresponding damping ratio is 20%. (2) Site and foundation, in which the criterion for classification of site soils and site itself are revised. Site soils are classified into 5 types instead of 4 types in the old code according to the shear wave velocity of soil layer, and are classified in more detail than before according to the type of site soil and overburden thickness. For the liquefaction potential evaluation method, the formula for determining the critical standard penetration test N-values (SPT N-values) and the formula for correcting the influence of the effective overburden stress on SPT N-values are revised. (3) Seismic calculation and safety evaluation of earth-rockfill dams, in which contents for seismic calculation are supplemented. Seismic calculation should include seismic stability calculation, permanent deformation calculation, safety evaluation of the anti-seepage body and liquefaction potential evaluation. The scope for adopting the dynamic analysis method for the analysis of seismic effect and safety evaluation is supplemented. For the earth-rockfill dams with the following conditions: a) higher than 150 m and with a design intensity of VII; b) higher than 70 m and with a design intensity of Ⅷ or Ⅸ; and c) presence of liquefiable soils in the foundation based on finite element method is necessary for dynamic analysis to comprehensively evaluate its seismic stability. For the earth-rockfill dams with deposits thicker than 40 m, finite element dynamic analysis is recommended, and the principles for dynamic analysis of earth-rockfill dams are provided, including selection of constitutive model and determination of model parameters, calculation of the permanent deformation and requirement for stability analysis. The basic principles for evaluating seismic safety of earth-rockfill dams according to the dynamic results are provided. (4) Earthquake resistant measures for earth-rockfill dams and foundations, in which earthquake resistant measures for CFRD are proposed according to the experience of the design, construction and lessons from earthquake damages of Zipingpu Dam in Wenchuan Earthquake, including seismic deformation control, protection of dam crest and nearby slope, anti-squeezing of vertical joints, anti-dislocation of horizontal construction joints and detailed structure design of joints.

Key words： Wenchuan Earthquake earthquake damage code revision seismic calculation earthquake resistant measure

收稿日期: 2014-09-06

基金资助:国家自然科学基金项目（51209234）; 水利部公益性行业科研专项经费项目（201501035）; 国家科技支撑计划项目课题（2013BAB06B02）; 国家重点基础研究发展计划（“973”计划）课题（2013CB036404）; 中国水利水电科学研究院青年专项（GE0145B102014）; 中国水利水电科学研究院科研专项项目（岩集1467）

作者简介: 刘小生（1962- ）,男,江西信丰人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土石坝与地基抗震理论和试验研究。E-mail: liuxsh@iwhr.com。

引用本文:

刘小生, 赵剑明, 杨玉生, 王钟宁, 杨正权, 刘启旺, 陈宁. 基于汶川地震震害经验的土石坝抗震设计规范修编[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(11): 2111-2118. LIU Xiao-sheng, ZHAO Jian-ming, YANG Yu-sheng, WANG Zhong-ning, YANG Zheng-quan, LIU Qi-wang, CHEN Ning. Advances in seismic design of earth-rockfill dams and foundations in China and revision of code based on lessons from Wenchuan Earthquake. Chinese J. Geot. Eng., 2015, 37(11): 2111-2118.

链接本文:

http://manu31.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_ytgcxb/CN/10.11779/CJGE201511025 或 http://manu31.magtech.com.cn/Jwk_ytgcxb/CN/Y2015/V37/I11/2111

[1] 陈厚群. 水工建筑物抗震设计规范修编的若干问题研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2011, 30(6): 4-10. (CHEN Hou-qun. Study on some revision issues of aseismatic design codes of hydraulic structures in China[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2011, 30(6): 4-10. (in Chinese))
[2] 陈厚群, 徐泽平, 李敏. 汶川大地震和大坝抗震安全[J]. 水利学报, 2008, 39(10): 1158-1167. (CHEN Hou-qun, XU Ze-ping, LI Min. Wenchuan Earthquake and seismic safety of large dams[J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2008, 39(10): 1158-1167. (in Chinese))
[3] 陈厚群. 汶川地震后对大坝抗震安全的思考[J]. 中国工程科学, 2009, 11(6): 44-53. (CHEN Hou-qun. Consideration on seismic safety of dams in China after the Wenchuan earthquake[J]. China Academic Journal, 2009, 11(6): 44-53. (in Chinese))
[4] 陈生水, 方绪顺, 钱亚俊. 高土石坝地震安全评价及抗震设计思考[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2011(1): 17-21. (CHEN Sheng-shui, FANG Xu-shun, QIAN Ya-jun. Thoughts on safety assessment and earthquake-resistance for high earth-rock dams[J]. Hydro-science and Engineering, 2011(1): 17-21. (in Chinese))
[5] 朱晟. 土石坝震害与抗震安全[J]. 水力发电学报, 2011, 30(6): 40-51. (ZHU Sheng. Earthquake damages and dam safety[J]. Hydroelectric Engineering, 2011, 30(6): 40-51. (in Chinese))
[6] 宋胜武, 蔡德文. 汶川大地震紫坪铺混凝土面板堆石坝震害现象与变形监测分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2009, 28(4): 840-849. (SONG Sheng-wu, CAI De-wen. Earthquake damage phenomenon and deformation monitoring analysis for Zipingpu concrete faced rockfill dam during Wenchuan Earthquake[J]. Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2009, 28(4): 840-849. (in Chinese))
[7] 陈生水, 霍家平, 章为民. “5•12” 汶川地震对紫坪铺混凝土面板坝的影响及原因分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 30(6): 795-801. (CHEN Sheng-shui, HUO Jia-ping, ZHANG Wei-min. Analysis of effects of “5•12” Wenchuan earthquake on Zipingpu concrete face rock-fill dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2008, 30(6): 795-801. (in Chinese))
[8] 高希章, 陆恩施, 杨志宏, 等. 经历”5•12”汶川大地震的紫坪铺面板堆石坝[C]// “5•12 “汶川特大地震灾后重建学术交流会. 成都, 2009. (GAO Xi-zhang, LU En-shi, YANG Zhi-hong, et al. The Zipingpu rock fill dam undergone the “5•12” Wenchuan Earthquake[C]// Symposium on Reconstruction after "5•12" Wenchuan Earthquake. Chengdu, 2009. (in Chinese))
[9] 宋彦刚, 邓良胜, 王昆, 等. 紫坪铺水库大坝震损及应急修复综述[J]. 四川水力发电, 2009, 28(2): 8-13. (SONG Yan-gang, DENG Liang-sheng, WANG Kun, et al. Seismic damages of Dam of Zipingpu Reservoir and emergency repairs[J]. Sichuan Water Power, 2009, 28(2): 8-13. (in Chinese))
[10] 孔宪京, 周扬, 邹德高, 等. 汶川地震余震记录及紫坪铺面板堆石坝余震反应研究[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2011, 33(5): 673-678. (KONG Xianjing, ZHOU Yang, ZOU De-gao, et al. Aftershock records of Wenchuan Earthquake and seismic response of Zipingpu Concrete Face Rock-fill Dam[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2011, 33(5): 673-678. (in Chinese))
[11] 孔宪京, 邹德高, 周扬, 等. 汶川地震中紫坪铺混凝土面板堆石坝震害分析[J]. 大连理工大学学报, 2009(5): 667-674. (KONG Xian-jing, ZOU De-gao, ZHOU Yang, et al. Earthquake damage analysis of Zipingpu concrete face rock-fill dam during Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Journal of Dalian University of Technology, 2009, 49(5): 667-674. (in Chinese))
[12] 赵剑明, 刘小生, 温彦锋, 等. 紫坪铺大坝汶川地震震害分析及高土石坝抗震减灾研究设想[J]. 水力发电, 2009(5): 11-14. (ZHAO Jian-ming, LIU Xiao-sheng, WEN Yan-feng, et al. Analysis of earthquake damage of the Zipingpu dam in Wenchuan earthquake and the study proposal on the anti-earthquake and disaster reduction of high earth-rock dam[J]. Water Power, 2009, 35(5): 11-14. (in Chinese))
[13] 赵剑明, 刘小生, 刘启旺, 等. 先期震动对土石坝地震永久变形的影响研究[J]. 世界地震工程, 2011, 27(1): 28-33. (ZHAO Jian-ming, LIU Xiao-sheng, LIU Qi-wang, et al. Study on the effect of pre-vibration on earthquake-induced permanent deformation of an earth-rock fill dam[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 27(1): 28-33. (in Chinese))
[14] GUAN Z C. Investigation of the 5.12 Wenchuan earthquake damages to the Zipingpu water control project and an assessment of its safety state[J]. Science in China Series E: Technological Sciences, 2009, 52(4): 820-834.
[15] ZHANG J M, YANG Z Y, GAO X Z, et al. Lessons from damages to high embankment dams in the May 12, 2008 Wenchuan earthquake[J]. ASCE Geotech Special Pub, 2010, 201: 1-31.
[16] 朱晟, 石高峰, 周建平. 碧口心墙堆石坝抗震复核分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2011, 30(增刊1): 2954-2962. (ZHU Sheng, SHI Gao-feng, ZHOU Jian-ping. Analysis of seismic review of Bikou rockfill dam with earth core[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2011, 30(S1): 2954-2962. (in Chinese))
[17] SL 203—97 水工建筑物抗震设计规范[S]. 1999 (SL 203—97 Specification of for seismic design of hydraulic structures[S]. 1999. (in Chinese))
[18] DL 5073—2000 水工建筑物抗震设计规范[S]. 2000. (DL 5073—2000 Specification of for seismic design of hydraulic structures[S]. 2000. (in Chinese))
[19] GB 50×××?××××. 水工建筑物抗震设计规范(送审稿) [S]. (GB 50×××?××××. Specifications for seismic design of hydraulic structures(Draft)[S]. (in Chinese))
[20] GB 50011—2010. 建筑抗震设计规范(S). (GB 50011—2010 Code for seismic design of buildings[S]. (in Chinese))
[21] GB 50487—2008 水利水电工程地质勘察规范[S]. 2008. (GB 50487—2008 Code for engineering geological investigation of water resources and hydropower[S]. 2008. (in Chinese))
[22] 刘小生, 赵剑明, 王钟宁, 等. 高土石坝抗震性能及抗震安全研究[R]. 北京: 中国水利水电科学研究院, 2011. (LIU Xiao-sheng, ZHAO Jian-ming, WANG Zhong-ning, et al. Research on seismic performance and seismic safety of high embankment dams[R]. Beijing: China Institute of Water Resource and Hydraulic Research, 2011. (in Chinese))
[23] 刘小生, 王钟宁, 汪小刚, 等. 面板坝大型振动台模型试验与动力分析[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2005: 40-41. (LIU Xiao-sheng, WANG Zhong-ning, WANG Xiao-gang, et al, Large scale table model tests and dynamic analysis of CFRD[M]. Beijing: China Water Power Press, 2005: 40-41. (in Chinese))
[24] 杨玉生, 刘小生, 赵剑明, 等. 土石坝坝体和地基液化分析方法与评价[J]. 水力发电学报, 2011, 30(6): 94-101. (YANG Yu-sheng, LIU Xiao-sheng, ZHAO Jian-ming, et al. Methods for liquefaction potential evaluation of embankment and foundation and discussion on these methods[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2011, 30(6): 91-108. (in Chinese))
[25] 赵剑明, 刘小生, 陈宁, 等. 高心墙堆石坝的极限抗震能力研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2009, 28(5): 97-102. (ZHAO Jian-ming, LIU Xiao-sheng, CHEN Ning, et al. Research on the maximum anti-seismic capability of high earth core rock-fill dam[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2009, 28(5): 97-102. (in Chinese))
[26] 杨玉生, 刘小生, 赵剑明, 等. 标准贯入击数的挖填方校正方法研究[J]. 水力发电学报, 2014, 33(1): 171-177. (YANG Yu-sheng, LIU Xiao-sheng, ZHAO Jian-ming, et al. Influence of excavation and filling on seismic liquefaction potential evaluation of foundation soils[J]. Journal of Hydroelectric Engineering, 2014, 33(1): 171-177. (in Chinese))
[27] 刘启旺, 杨玉生, 刘小生, 等. 标贯击数液化判别方法的比较[J]. 地震工程学报, 2015(已录用). (LIU Qi-wang, YANG Yu-sheng, LIU Xiao-sheng, et al. Comparison of standard penetration test(SPT) method for evaluating seismic liquefaction potential[J]. China Earthquake Engineering Journal, 2015(Accepted). (in Chinese))