Three-dimensional elastoplastic constitutive model for normal consolidated clays
DU Xiu-li1, 2, MA Chao1, 2, LU De-chun1, 2
1. Key Lab of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering, Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China
Abstract：The nonlinear unified strength theory in β stress space is similar to the Drucker-Prager strength theory in principal stress space. Compared with the establishment of Cam-clay model with stress parameters of p and q, a new three-dimensional elastoplastic constitutive model is established in β stress space. A new dilatancy equation is proposed, and then plastic potential function is obtained combined with the orthogonality condition. The new model is based on the nonassociated flow rule and yield function of modified Cam-clay model. It is a new idea to establish three-dimensional elastoplastic constitutive model directly. The proposed model in which the failure condition is based on nonlinear unified strength theory can reflect the deformation and strength characteristics of soils reasonably, and can be devolved into the Cam-clay model.
杜修力, 马超, 路德春. 正常固结黏土的三维弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2015, 37(2): 235-241.
DU Xiu-li, MA Chao, LU De-chun. Three-dimensional elastoplastic constitutive model for normal consolidated clays. Chinese J. Geot. Eng., 2015, 37(2): 235-241.
[1] 杜修力, 马超, 路德春. 岩土类材料的非线性统一强度模型[J]. 力学学报, 2014, 46(3): 389-397. (DU Xiu-li, MA Chao, LU De-chun. Nonlinear unified strength model of geomaterials[J]. Chinese Journal of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 2014, 46(3): 389-397. (in Chinese)) [2] LADE P V, DUNCAN J M. Elasto-plastic stress-strain theory for cohesionless soil [J]. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division, 1975, 101(10): 1037-1053. [3] MATSUOKA H, NAKAI T. Stress-deformation and strength characteristics of soil under three different principal stresses[J]. Proceedings of JSCE, 1974, 232: 59-70. [4] LADE P V. Single hardening constitutive model for soil, rock, and concrete[J]. International Journal of Solids Structures, 1995, 32(14): 1963-1978. [5] ROSCOE K H, SCHOFIELD A N, THURAIRAJAH A. Yielding of clay in states wetter than critical[J]. Géotechnique, 1963, 13(3): 211-240. [6] ROSCOE K H, BURLAND J B. On the generalized stress-strain behavior of an ideal wet clay[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968: 535-609. [7] WROTH C P, HOULSBY G T. Soil mechanics-property characterization and analysis procedures[C]// Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering. San Francisco, 1985: 1-55. [8] ZIENKIEWICZ O C, PANDE G N. Some useful forms of isotropic yield surface for soil and rock mechanics[C]// Finite Elements in Geomechnaics. London, 1977: 179-190. [9] MATSUOKA H, YAO Yang-ping, SUN De-an. The Cam-clay models revised by the SMP criterion[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1999, 39(1): 81-95. [10] 沈珠江. 土的弹塑性应力应变关系的合理形式[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1980, 2(2): 11-19. (SHEN Zhu-jiang. The rational form of stress-strain relationship of soils based on elasto-plasticity theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1980, 2(2): 11-19. (in Chinese)) [11] 沈珠江. 理论土力学[M]. 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2000. (SHEN Zhu-jiang. Theory of soil mechanics[M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2000. (in Chinese)) [12] 李广信. 土的三维本构关系的探讨与模型验证[D]. 北京:清华大学, 1985. (LI Guang-xin. A study of three-dimensional constitutive relationship of soils and an examination of various modles[D]. Beijing: Tsinghua University, 1985. (in Chinese)) [13] YAO Yang-ping, SUN De-an. Application of Lade’s criterion to Cam-clay model[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2000, 126(1): 112-119. [14] 孙德安, 姚仰平. 基于SMP准则的双屈服面弹塑性模型的三维化[J]. 岩土工程学报, 1999, 21(5): 631-634. (SUN De-an, YAO Yang-ping. Generalization of elasto-plastic model with two yield surfaces based on SMP criterion[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical engineering, 1999, 21(5): 631-634. (in Chinese)) [15] YAO Yang-ping, LU De-chun, ZHOU An-nan, et al. Generalized non-linear strength theory and transformed stress space[J]. Science in China (Ser E), 2004, 47(6): 691-709. [16] CHANG C S, YIN Z Y. Modeling stress-dilatancy for sand under compression and extension loading conditions[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2010, 136(6): 777-786. [17] YAO Y P, MATSUOKA H, SUN D A. A unified elastoplastic model for clay and sand with the SMP criterion[C]// Proceedings of the 8th Australia New Zealand Conference on Geomechanics. Hobart, 1999: 997-1003. [18] CHOWDHURY E Q, NAKAI T. Consequences of the t ij-concept and a new modeling approach[J]. Computers and Geotechnics, 1998, 23(3): 131-164.
