Abstract：To consider different effects of risk factors on the risk assessment and to overcome the problem that qualitative evaluation information and expert remark under incomplete information cannot be utilized in the comprehensive risk evaluation for deep pit construction (DPC), a synthetic risk evaluation method for DPC is established based on the evidence theory. The index system of risk assessment for DPC is established on the basis of risk identification firstly. Then, the risk synthetic assessment model in the light of the evidence theory is proposed. In the assessment model, the weight of each stage factor is determined by using the analytic hierarchy process. The mass functions for calculating indexes are determined by expert remarks. The index mass functions are fused by the linear weighted method, and the decision rules are established based on the belief of the risk level. The proposed method is reasonable and practical, which is proved by an example, and it may provide reference for other similar projects.
杜修力, 张雪峰, 张明聚, 侯本伟. 基于证据理论的深基坑工程施工风险综合评价[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2014, 36(1): 155-161.
DU Xiu-li, ZHANG Xue-feng, ZHANG Ming-ju, HOU Ben-wei. Risk synthetic assessment for deep pit construction based on evidence theory. Chinese J. Geot. Eng., 2014, 36(1): 155-161.
[1] 黄宏伟, 边亦海. 深基坑工程施工中的风险管理[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2005, 1(4): 611-614. (HUANG Hong-wei, BIAN Yi-hai. Risk management in the construction of deep excavation engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2005, 1(4): 611-614. (in Chinese)) [2] 周红波, 姚 浩, 卢建华. 上海某轨道交通深基坑工程施工风险评估[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2006, 28(增刊): 1902-1906. (ZHOU Hong-bo, YAO hao, LU Jian-hua. Construction risk assessment on deep foundation pits of a metro line in Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(S0): 1902-1906. (in Chinese)) [3] 曹文贵, 翟友成, 张永杰. 悬臂支护基坑失稳风险的改进风险矩阵分析方法[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(2): 210-216. (CAO Wen-gui, ZHAI You-cheng, ZHANG Yong-jie. Improved risk matrix method of instability risk for excavations with cantilever retaining[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(2): 210-216. (in Chinese)) [4] 边亦海, 黄宏伟, 李 剑. 可信性方法在深基坑施工期风险分析中的应用[J]. 地下空间与工程学报, 2006, 2(1): 70-73. (BIAN Yi-hai, HUANG Hong-wei, LI Jian. Risk analysis in the construction stage of deep excavation engineering based on dependability method[J]. Chinese Journal of Underground Space and Engineering, 2006, 2(1): 70-73. (in Chinese)) [5] 吴威皋, 黄忠辉, 金磊铭, 等. 基于数据相关性的基坑工程风险预警分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(增刊): 233-236. (WU Wei-gao, HUANG Zhong-hui, JIN Lei-ming, et al. Risk analysis and warning in excavation engineering based on data dependency[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(S0): 233-236. (in Chinese)) [6] 唐传政, 彭晓秋, 熊秋梅, 等. 武汉地铁 3 号线一期工程车站基坑施工风险控制分析[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(增刊): 415-418. (TANG Chuan-zheng, PENG Xiao-qiu, XIONG Qiu-mei, et al. Control and analysis of construction risk in excavations of stations of project stage No. 1 of Metro Line 3 in Wuhan[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(S0): 415-418. (in Chinese)) [7] 刘树亚, 欧阳蓉. 基坑工程对深圳地铁的结构变形影响和风险控制技术[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(增刊): 638-642. (LIU Shu-ya, OU YANG-Rong. Deformation of Shenzhen subway aroused by deep excavations and its risk control technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(S0): 638-642. (in Chinese)) [8] 王鸣晓. 模糊综合评判法在基坑工程风险评估中的应用[J]. 公路交通科技, 2011, 28(6): 57-61. (WANG Ming-xiao. Application of fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in risk assessment of excavation engineering[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2011, 28(6): 57-61. (in Chinese)) [9] 何锡兴, 周红波, 姚 浩. 上海某深基坑工程风险识别与模糊评估[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2008, 28(增刊): 1912-1915. (HE Xi-xing, ZHOU Hong-bo, YAO Hao. Construction risk identification and assessment of a deep foundation pit in Shanghai[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2006, 28(S0): 1912-1915. (in Chinese)) [10] 辛 欣, 万 鹏, 沈圆顺. 土岩组合地质条件下的基坑工程施工风险评估[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2012, 34(增刊): 342-346. (XIN Xin, WAN Peng, SHEN Yuan-shun. Risk assessment of construction of excavations in areas of rock and soil[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2012, 34(S0): 342-346. (in Chinese)) [11] 兰守奇, 张庆贺. 基于模糊理论的深基坑施工期风险评估[J]. 岩土工程学报, 2009, 31(4): 648-652. (LAN Shou-qi, ZHANG Qing-he. Risk assessment of deep excavation during construction based on fuzzy theory[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2009, 31(4): 648-652. (in Chinese)) [12] KANGARI R, RIGGS L S. Construction risk assessment by linguistics[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1989, 36(2): 126-131. [13] CHEN S J, CHEN S M. Fuzzy risk analysis based on similarity measures of generalized fuzzy numbers[J]. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2003, 11(1): 45-56. [14] CHEN S J, CHEN S M. Fuzzy risk analysis based on measures of similarity between interval-valued fuzzy numbers[J]. Computers and Mathematics with Applications, 2008, 55(11): 1670-1685. [15] DEMPSTER A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping[J]. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38: 325-339. [16] DEMPSTER A P. A generalization of bayesian inference[J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1968, 30: 205-247. [17] SHAFER G. A mathematical theory of evidence[M]. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976. [18] 王莲芬, 许树柏. 层次分析法引论[M]. 北京: 中国人民大学出版社, 1990. (WANG Lian-fen, XU Shu-bai. Introduction to the analytic hierarchy process[M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 1990. (in Chinese)) [19] WANG J, YANG J B, SEN P. Safety analysis and synthesis using fuzzy sets and evidential reasoning[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1995, 47: 103-117. [20] 杨 萍, 刘卫东. 基于证据理论的群决策层次评价方法研究[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2002, 24(2): 42-44 (YANG Ping, LIU Wei-dong. Study on group decision making in the hierarchical evaluation process based on evidential reasoning[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2002, 24(2): 42-44. (in Chinese)) [21] 中华人民共和国建设部. 地铁及地下工程建设风险管理指南[M]. 北京. 中国建筑出版社. 2007 (Ministry of Construction P R China. Guidelines of risk management for the construction of tunnel and underground works[M]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2007. (in Chinese)) [22] FABRE S, APPRIOU A, BRIATTET X. Presentation and description of two classification methods using data fusion based on sensor management[J]. Information Fusion, 2001, 2(1): 49-71. [23] 朱芳霞. 区间数相离度的决策矩阵排序的一种新方法[J]. 合肥学院学报(自然科学版). 2005, 15(2): 1-4. (ZHU Fang-xia. A new method based on deviation degree for priority of decision-making matrix[J]. Journal of Hefei University (Natural Sciences), 2005, 15(2): 1-4. (in Chinese)) 暨中国土木工程学会隧道及地下工程分会第十八届年会 （第1号通知） 中国土木工程学会隧道及地下工程分会将于2014年10月底在浙江省杭州市召开2014中国隧道与地下工程大会暨中国土木工程学会隧道及地下工程分会第十八届年会。本次年会将围绕“现代城市地下空间的综合利用及绿色隧道工程”主题,通过“现代城市地下空间开发的先进理念与设计”、“隧道及城市地下工程的先进修建技术”、“隧道及城市地下工程的防灾、减灾和环保、节能技术”等3个分主题进行研讨。本次年会收录的论文将正式出版发行。欢迎业内科技工作者踊跃投稿并积极参加会议。 主办单位：中国土木工程学会隧道及地下工程分会 承办单位：浙江大学城市学院；杭州市建设委员会；协办单位：待定。 会议主题：现代城市地下空间的综合利用及绿色隧道工程。 分组报告与讨论主题：①现代城市地下空间开发的先进理念与设计；②现代城市地下空间开发利用的国际新动态；③现代城市地下空间的规划、设计与研究；④现代城市地下空间开发利用的可持续发展研究；⑤现代城市地下工程低碳节能与环保。 隧道及城市地下工程的先进修建技术：①城市轨道交通工程修建技术；②越江及海底隧道工程修建技术；③复杂山岭隧道工程修建技术；④城市地下空间施工技术；⑤隧道及地下工程的新技术、新设备、新材料、新工艺。 隧道及城市地下工程的防灾、减灾和环保、节能技术：①隧道及地下工程全寿命周期风险管理；②隧道及地下工程施工对周边环境影响及控制；③隧道及地下工程监控量测及超前预报；④隧道及地下工程健康监测与耐久性；⑤隧道及地下工程病害检测与修复技术；⑥隧道及地下工程节能减耗新技术。 论文征集：论文应围绕会议议题展开,要求内容具体、明确、严谨,且未公开发表。会议挑选部分优秀论文在《现代隧道技术》（EI刊源）正刊出版,其余将以《现代隧道技术》增刊形式出版,论文格式与要求参见《现代隧道技术》投稿指南。 重要日期：论文提交2014年4月30日,论文录用通知 2014年7月31日,（上述日期均为最后截止日期）。 联系人：魏 纲,张 菁；电话：0571-88018805,0571-88284399；e-mail: tuwb2014@126.com；网址：http://www.cces-tuwb.com/index.asp,通讯地址：浙江省杭州市拱墅区湖州街51号,理2-315,邮编：310015。 （大会组委会 供 稿）
